Some comments that were made in my recent "2000.00+ MIJ Clone" thread, got me thinking about this. Would you pay significantly more than the street value of a guitar because it had been owned by a celebrity?
I tried to think back to an instance where I was faced with this kind of choice. The only thing that comes to mind was about five years ago, seeing a 12 string acoustic on eBay that had been owned by the guitarist in America. I have to admit, the thought of having the guitar that played the riff in Sister Giolden Hair sitting in my livingroom was tempting. In the end, my financial circumstances made the decision not to hit the Buy It Now button easier.....but I have a feeling that if it had happened a couple of years later when my income had almost doubled, I probably would have been an owner.
so....What do you think? I'm not suggesting most of us would have the means to own a Clapton or Townsend guitar, for example, but would you stretch an extra grand or two or three more than market value to buy a Tele or 335 based on the fact that it had been owned or played by someone special?


Reply With Quote


Bookmarks